Quality
Moderator: moderators
Quality
Get rid of power quality, it is insane.
there is only one level of power quality in the real world, your machine either runs because it has enough power or it does not run and can not produce your goods. Regardless it will not improve nor detract from the quality level of the goods being produced.
Also I think that water quality should be able to be researched.
One trip to Mexico will tell you that there is more than one kind of water and improvements can be made on water being produced.
there is only one level of power quality in the real world, your machine either runs because it has enough power or it does not run and can not produce your goods. Regardless it will not improve nor detract from the quality level of the goods being produced.
Also I think that water quality should be able to be researched.
One trip to Mexico will tell you that there is more than one kind of water and improvements can be made on water being produced.
About the power he is right , he doesn't ask we should be able to research it , but he ask that the power QO isn't including in quality calculations
For ex :
WOOD : WOOD Q + WATER Q + POWER Q + SEEDS Q
Devided by 4 .
he ask that it would be
Wood : WOOD Q + SEEDS Q + WATER Q
DEvided by 3
Am i right ?
For ex :
WOOD : WOOD Q + WATER Q + POWER Q + SEEDS Q
Devided by 4 .
he ask that it would be
Wood : WOOD Q + SEEDS Q + WATER Q
DEvided by 3
Am i right ?
Firstly, there most definitely are quality differences in power. And I'm not talking about the cleanliness of the source, since once the power is made that's invisible. There is an actual quality to power: consistency.
Perhaps back in science class you had some type of setup where you turned a crank to power a lighbulb. (Or using an exercise bike is a popular museum type of thing.) Naturally as you turned faster the bulb got brighter. Well what if you were the power source, how steady could you keep that going? Not very. Yet it's very bad for most of our gadgets to have variance. Obviously a higher voltage is dangerous, but in many cases a lower one can damage circuits as well.
So a higher quality power will stay much more tightly to the promised voltage. And there are other attributes that should be kept constant (for example, what frequency does your alternating current alter at?) Fortunately, most of us are used to high quality power.
Now as for it's inclusion in the quality calculations, that is a bit arbitrary. But the whole quality system is rather arbitrary. Look at wine for example, it uses grapes, sugar, glass, and water. Those 5 (plus research) contribute equally to the output. But really, shouldn't that be 70% grapes, 20% research, and 10% for the rest?
I think we just have to accept that they are arbitrary values to get the game working, and then base our decisions off of that.
Perhaps back in science class you had some type of setup where you turned a crank to power a lighbulb. (Or using an exercise bike is a popular museum type of thing.) Naturally as you turned faster the bulb got brighter. Well what if you were the power source, how steady could you keep that going? Not very. Yet it's very bad for most of our gadgets to have variance. Obviously a higher voltage is dangerous, but in many cases a lower one can damage circuits as well.
So a higher quality power will stay much more tightly to the promised voltage. And there are other attributes that should be kept constant (for example, what frequency does your alternating current alter at?) Fortunately, most of us are used to high quality power.
Now as for it's inclusion in the quality calculations, that is a bit arbitrary. But the whole quality system is rather arbitrary. Look at wine for example, it uses grapes, sugar, glass, and water. Those 5 (plus research) contribute equally to the output. But really, shouldn't that be 70% grapes, 20% research, and 10% for the rest?
I think we just have to accept that they are arbitrary values to get the game working, and then base our decisions off of that.
Last edited by Guest on 10.07.2007, 18:55, edited 1 time in total.
GOOD, ANd i like all games things cannot be completly relistic, If for example, In one of my games, you can get some SAS witch are brtish special forces, for the un educated, whell only they can swim, And if you leave them there theyl just keep swimming till the game ends, but say they put a limite to how long they could swim, They just drown, Then people after a big battle relise theyr SAS are dead and all that for nothing, like the human brain could not keep up with all this. Then there is the element of fun, we all know any human (to a point) can walk thro forest but in the game only then frenche can do that, This places the element that the frenche (this is true) are good at gorilla warfare witch isdavidfranses wrote:Ok![]()
![]()
I surrender
- Hidding waiting attacking running

Pm if you want to know what game this is
