If you thought that would be my response, then you definitely never understood my intentions. Maybe you didn't read my posts carefully enough, but from the beginning I argued that the only difference between us was a matter of definition, not action. I was defining profit over a series of steps while you defined profit for a single step. Neither is wrong, you just have to know what you are evaluating.kiddbeck wrote:You completely agreed? Souds my words worked.
I assumed that somebody will tell the poster: To sell the cars for 50K is totally right, if you product all the materials yourself, since 50K-28K>0, your company was still improving with time.
Don't you feel the logic is quite familiar?
Your debate was helpful to me. I was able to understand you perspective of cost and it reminded me to take into consideration the profit of each step of production. But I think you never really understood my perspective which is why you continually called it a mistake. If you take a little time to think outside the box, maybe you will see that my approach is not wrong, but just different. The fact that I have not yet disagreed with you on what a wise action would be should be proof of that. Net profit over a series of steps does not mean that making a loss in your final production step is wise.