kapi lotto~

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 02:38

ILIYYILI wrote:I think they got the point

long live kapi-lotto!!!

Kapi-Lotto will never happen.

Expectually when everyone keeps making a joke of it as half of the post in this thread are doing.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 08:53

Azer Productions wrote:
ILIYYILI wrote:I think they got the point

long live kapi-lotto!!!
Kapi-Lotto will never happen.

Expectually when everyone keeps making a joke of it as half of the post in this thread are doing.

Its not about supporting lottery anymore, its about systematically dismantling anyone who is apriori against lottery because of his beliefs and trying to make everyone else following his/her beliefs.

Think about all the ecologists, we should ban all chemical plants too.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 15:54

you might as well close the thread i started all this beliefs guff and i did it so that we could say that we have thought of every thing and not talk of banning everything just because you dont eat it.
My point was that NOT everyone WOULD have to gamble and if you did not like you had to quit kapilands.

Can anyone come up with any more ideas about kappi-lotto and NOT TAKING OUT EVERY SINGLE PRODUCT

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 16:04

kingrewt wrote:NOT everyone WOULD have to gamble

lol...
you know... there would be a lottory thing, and not evryone HAVE to do it... why did you think you'll HAVE to gamble?!
that's just stupid.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 16:07

kingrewt wrote:My point was that NOT everyone WOULD have to gamble and if you did not like you had to quit kapilands.

So, you are suggesting something that might drive customers away. Upjers won't be to happy about that.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 16:11

Azer Productions wrote:
kingrewt wrote:My point was that NOT everyone WOULD have to gamble and if you did not like you had to quit kapilands.
So, you are suggesting something that might drive customers away. Upjers won't be to happy about that.

my english sucks,
explain please?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 16:18

GoldenEye wrote:It should be every two hours with five minute breaks between the rounds, every player can take part twice each round, so we have got at least 24 chances per day and player.

Winning chances should be at 98.2 percent. Less would be very unfair to small and still developing companies, more would simply be uninteresting.

Participation needs to be obligatory, otherwise there might be not enough participants and the prizes would be too low.
Every participant has to spent at least 207 coins per week, he can also chose a second version of this lottery: Spending 12 coins each 34 minutes for two, increases his winning chances to 98.74 percent and raises (in case of a win) his fixed assets to the maximum minus 23.8 Caps.

If the "jackpot" does not get hit in one, all coins are transfered to a real life bank... on a trust basis by a swimming pool attendant called Lehman. If the jackpot gets hit in the second round, the lottery will have to pause for 17 hours and eleven minutes. This is the time it needs to evolve a new financial masterplan for a usual European country.

Real life issues are to be ignored in our lottery... this is only a game, isn't it? So why thinking about upjers or someone else... the main thing is to have fun!
________________________
Suggestion refused. Reason: Simply not developed enough... First think about an idea and arguments, then articulate them, then present them. Thank you!

that is why i started all this. i was just countering golden eyes comment about it being obligatory and all this started

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 17:15

i think sarcasm in goldeneyes post is painfully obvious and needs no further explanation

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 17:18

GREED inc. wrote:i think sarcasm in goldeneyes post is painfully obvious and needs no further explanation

I agree.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 17:21

though I still wanted to clarify it as some people don't have much humour

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 21:39

kingrewt wrote:though I still wanted to clarify it as some people don't have much humour

em...
people like YOU?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 22.09.2009, 22:41

ILIYYILI wrote:
kingrewt wrote:though I still wanted to clarify it as some people don't have much humour
em...
people like YOU?

amen to that

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 23.09.2009, 17:01

yes people do like me. I have some humour but I am a bit serious at times and usually don't understand sarcasm that much. Everyone has their faults.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 23.09.2009, 18:47

go watch comedy... read jokes... have fun

i heard it's healty

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 23.09.2009, 18:52

back to the kapi lotto...
whats the difference between contests and kapi lotto.

there is.

but not as much as you might think