Ad research back to Q1..

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 06.04.2009, 16:54

No I did't sell or buy any research, at least not while I was conscious.
I was hoping you could check wat happened that day.
Is it not possible for you to see the transactions ?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 06.04.2009, 17:10

I think it is.

That is how they know you're not cheating.

pearlbay · Post by **pearlbay** » 08.04.2009, 13:08

sally wrote:No I did't sell or buy any research, at least not while I was conscious.
I was hoping you could check wat happened that day.
Is it not possible for you to see the transactions ?

The only possibility I have here is that you bought a new research yourself, which has overwritten your existent research. I cannot look beyond the 29th (the records have already been deleted), but there are none on the 29th or afterwards - so it's only possible the research has been bought before.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 08.04.2009, 14:35

So 5days ago when you first posted you didn't think about looking back then? :S

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 08.04.2009, 20:32

That is very funny (not) because I would like to know what happened on the 28th of march...and so this is now erased..I was afraid that would happen.
Maybe if we had one more active administrator............

hmmm.. I wonder where we could find one...

Ofcourse I also realize it is my fault too, I could have posted on the upjers link, but I decided to wait.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 08.04.2009, 22:12

Judge, Jury+ Executioner time

Against:
Since sally didn't post an upjers bug report form you could say it's slightly her fault.

FOR:
But she did of course post on the official forum in the correct place and in the correct style and therefore shouldn't of been expected to do anymore...

Coclusion
So in conclusion sally should get back Q50 ad research, in my humble opinion. She said it was around ~Q52 and so not to give the other players an unfair disadvantage and seeing as there was 1 small thing which she could of done herself, I say Q50...

well yeah that's my view on the situation

Just not sure if the programmers can do that or not?

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 08.04.2009, 23:10

But wait!!!

She has looked before the 29th, because she said I sold ads on the 21st.

[quote="pearlbay"][quote="sally"]Goodmorning Pearlbay.

This morning I saw my research on advertisements was finished so I was going to set it again and then saw it was back to Q1:

Advertisements Quality: 1
Charges: 400

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 09.04.2009, 07:57

scary

lemme go get my pipe, trench coat and flat cap

ohhh anyone have a magnifying glass?

Back to the point: So what is going to be done about this?

pearlbay · Post by **pearlbay** » 09.04.2009, 09:25

Hey Sally, we're taking care of it!

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 09.04.2009, 09:32

Thank you pearlbay.

And thank you felix for supporting me this way, you can put your trenchcoat and flat cap back in the closet.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 09.04.2009, 17:47

Aww do I have to

I like them

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 09.04.2009, 18:07

Well ok you can wear them, but then I need to see a picture of you dressed like that on your profile.
Including pipe.

Guest · Post by **Guest** » 09.04.2009, 19:57

Hmmm then I may need to buy them first XD

Business Simulation Kapilands

Ad research back to Q1..

Re: Ad research back to Q1..