have rewards for both buyers and sellers.
All in favor say "Aye",
All opposed say "Nay".
contest counter balance
Moderator: moderators
-
Guest
I may have totaly misunderstood this, but both sides already benefit.
A buyer benefits if they send enough goods into the contest company to finish in the top 100.
Are you saying everyone who buys the contest goods should get something even if they don't finish in the top 100?
Because if thats the case it kind of removes the point of the contest and for that reason I say nay.
and/or
The seller benefits from selling contest goods at considerbly higher prices than is normal for that product. Sellers can make huge sums of money in these contests.
Why reward them further? or is it so the bigger companies, that decide to sell in contests, always get something extra as they can always sell more than a newer company. so again I say nay.
So can you clairfy what is being asked here please.
A buyer benefits if they send enough goods into the contest company to finish in the top 100.
Are you saying everyone who buys the contest goods should get something even if they don't finish in the top 100?
Because if thats the case it kind of removes the point of the contest and for that reason I say nay.
and/or
The seller benefits from selling contest goods at considerbly higher prices than is normal for that product. Sellers can make huge sums of money in these contests.
Why reward them further? or is it so the bigger companies, that decide to sell in contests, always get something extra as they can always sell more than a newer company. so again I say nay.
So can you clairfy what is being asked here please.